Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746378›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Service delivery, behavioural, and self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy: summary of a Cochrane systematic review.

Chun Dang, Yaoheng Lu, Wenneng Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chun DangDepartment of Periodical Press, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5023-6095
Yaoheng LuDepartment of General Surgery, Chengdu Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China. cdutcmlyh@163.com.
Wenneng LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Chengdu Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China. liuwennengsc@163.com.

Funding

Chengdu Municipal Health Commission and Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2024 Commission-School Joint Science and Technology Innovation Fund WXLH202403265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-pharmacological interventions, including behavioural, self-management, and service delivery approaches, are increasingly incorporated into adult epilepsy care to address persistent seizures, impaired quality of life, and psychosocial burden. However, the effectiveness of these interventions remains uncertain. This article summarises and critically appraises a recent Cochrane systematic review that evaluated service delivery, behavioural, and self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy. The review included 36 randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials involving 5,834 participants. Outcomes of interest comprised seizure frequency, seizure-related outcomes, health-related quality of life, psychosocial functioning, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE framework. Psycho-behavioural interventions were associated with modest short-term reductions in seizure frequency at three to six months, based on moderate-certainty evidence, although no sustained long-term benefit was demonstrated. Mind–body interventions showed mixed and generally small short-term effects with low-certainty evidence. Self-management programmes did not reduce seizure frequency but were associated with an increased likelihood of seizure freedom in some studies. Across most intervention categories, no consistent improvement in health-related quality of life was observed. Evidence for physical exercise and service delivery interventions was limited and highly uncertain. Safety outcomes were inconsistently reported, and no clear evidence of harm was identified. Current evidence suggests that non-pharmacological interventions may offer modest and context-specific benefits as adjuncts to pharmacological therapy in adult epilepsy. More research is needed to determine the effects of non-pharmacological interventions for adults with epilepsy.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyEpilepsySelf-ManagementAdultHumansQuality of LifeCochraneEpilepsySystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.