ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026
[Bilateral ring-shaped stromal crystalline corneal deposits in an 8-year-old child].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An 8‑year-old boy was presented for assessment of stromal crystalline corneal opacity in both eyes with increasing photophobia. Slit-lamp microscopy revealed anterior stromal, crystalline, ring-shaped corneal deposits in both eyes, with otherwise unremarkable corneal findings. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with a juvenile form of Schnyder corneal dystrophy. Annual follow-up was performed over a period of 3 years. The family history revealed a case of Schnyder corneal dystrophy in the patient's grandmother. In cases of atypical crystalline, annular corneal opacities in children, Schnyder corneal dystrophy should be considered in the differential diagnosis. It should be noted that crystalline deposits are present in only 50% of all patients with this corneal dystrophy. The diagnosis can be particularly challenging in young patients as typical clinical signs, such as discoid stromal corneal opacity or arcus lipoides corneae, often do not appear until the third decade of life and early findings of corneal dystrophies in childhood are rarely described in the literature. In the present case, the positive family history facilitated the diagnosis. Excimer laser-assisted phototherapeutic keratectomy was discussed as a potential treatment option but was not desired by the family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41746358What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.