ArticleMedical physics2026
Visualization of small vibrations inside an MRI scanner using video motion amplification.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) acquisition requires the application of strong magnetic field gradients, which can induce mechanical vibrations in tissues or phantoms, potentially leading to signal loss or degradation. A qualitative assessment of these vibrations would be valuable for quality assurance (QA). Conventional methods, such as piezoelectric accelerometers and laser interferometry, have limitations in their applicability and availability. There remains a need for a readily accessible method to detect and characterize these vibrations as part of a robust QA protocol. PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of using motion amplification of high-speed video to assess vibrations during DW-MRI scanning.
methodsA gel phantom simulating a human head was positioned supine within a head receive coil inside an MRI scanner. A 45-degree angled mirror was placed to visualize the phantom's face, while a high-speed camera, positioned outside the scanner, was used to record videos under two conditions: (1) the scanner in an idle state (still condition), and (2) during a DW-MRI scan (vibration condition). The recorded videos were processed using a motion amplification software tool to enhance subtle movements. The motion of multiple position markers affixed to the phantom was quantitatively analyzed.
resultsNo motion was visible to the naked eye under either still or scanning conditions. However, motion amplification revealed clear marker displacement during DW-MRI, with substantially smaller movement during scanner idling. Across all facial markers and directions (X (L-R), Y (A-P) and Z (I-S)), median root-mean-square displacement increased from 0.85 µm (range: 0.61-1.50 µm) at idle to 2.59 µm (2.04-4.31 µm) during DW-MRI scanning (b = 2500 s/mm
conclusionsMotion amplification of high-speed video provides a viable method for detecting and analyzing vibrations during MRI scans. This approach could serve as a valuable tool for QA, offering an alternative to conventional vibration assessment techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.