Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746161›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Simultaneous synthesis of perfusion and ventilation images from CT using a dual-decoder residual attention network for lung disease diagnosis.

Meng Wang, Xi Liu, Haoze Li, Meixin Zhao, Tianyu Xiong, David Huang, Jing Cai, Weifang Zhang, Li-Sheng Geng, Ruijie Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meng WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xi LiuSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6924-4525
Haoze LiSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Meixin ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tianyu XiongDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
David HuangPeng Huanwu Collaborative Center for Research and Education, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Jing CaiDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Weifang ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3879-1285
Li-Sheng GengSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Ruijie YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-0075

Funding

Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Project F20240923166034Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Project Z221100003522028Beijing Natural Science Foundation Z230003China Medical Health Development Foundation and Key Clinical Project of Peking University Third Hospital BYSY2022071China Medical Health Development Foundation and Key Clinical Project of Peking University Third Hospital BYSYZD2023016China Medical Health Development Foundation and Key Clinical Project of Peking University Third Hospital BYSYZD2024005National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFA1014104National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFC2419400National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFC2419401National Natural Science Foundation of China 11735003National Natural Science Foundation of China 11975041Non-Profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2023-JKCS-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning algorithms can synthesize pulmonary functional images from CT images. However, previous studies have only been able to predict either ventilation or perfusion from CT, limiting the holistic evaluation of lung function. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based framework for simultaneously generating lung perfusion and ventilation images from three-dimensional CT.

methodsA total of 98 cases who underwent single-photon emission CT perfusion images (SPECT PI) with

resultsOverall, DDRAN and RAN achieved comparable performance. The average SSIM values of the DDRAN/RAN model were 0.871/0.866 (p < 0.05) for PI and 0.830/0.825 (p < 0.05) for VI, and the Rs values were 0.836/0.819 and 0.732/0.731, respectively. The DDRAN/RAN model achieved average DSC values of 0.795/0.796 for PI and 0.708/0.718 for VI in low-function regions, and 0.857/0.849 for PI and 0.793/0.793 for VI in high-function regions. In the two-part reader study, the synthesized perfusion and ventilation images received almost acceptable scores across all experience levels and demonstrated diagnostic potential.

conclusionsWe have developed a dual-decoder residual attention network that enables the simultaneous synthesis of lung perfusion and ventilation images from three-dimensional CT. Preliminary results indicate moderate-to-high structural-wise and functional-wise concordances, and our proposed model demonstrates comparable accuracy when benchmarked against single-decoder models. The synthesized perfusion and ventilation images can potentially be used for precise diagnosis and guiding functional lung avoidance radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung DiseasesPerfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle Agedcross modalitydeep learningimage synthesislung functional imaging

Identifiers

PMID41746161
PMCPMC12939808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.