ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Exploration and Application of Multiluminance Mobility Test in Bietti Crystalline Dystrophy.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the multiluminance mobility test (MLMT) as a functional vision assessment tool for Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) and explored its relationship with structural and visual function parameters. Methods: A retrospective study of 34 BCD patients (67 eyes) incorporated 2 additional low light levels (0.1 and 0.5 lux) into the MLMT. Visual function assessments included best-corrected visual acuity, visual field (VF), and microperimetry (MP). Macular structure was evaluated via spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. MLMT performance was correlated with these parameters using Spearman's rank correlation tests. Results: Despite severe global photoreceptor dysfunction, a notable proportion of participants (38.8%) passed the MLMT at 1 lux or less, with 23.9% reaching the lowest luminance (0.1 lux). MLMT lux scores correlated significantly with best-corrected visual acuity (ρ = -0.5322; P = 0.0012), mean defect of VF (ρ = -0.5919; P = 0.0005), and mean macular sensitivity of MP (MS-MP; ρ = 0.7175; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that subjects with preserved foveal ellipsoid zone had significantly higher MLMT lux scores and better MS-MP (both P < 0.05) than those with ellipsoid zone atrophy. Although visual function parameters were markedly impaired in certain patients, their MLMT performance remained relatively favorable. Conclusions: The standardized MLMT has a limited range for assessing advanced BCD. Preservation of central macular structure, rather than visual acuity alone, appears to be critical for mobility performance in BCD patients. Disease-specific adaptations of functional end points are needed for BCD clinical trials. Translational Relevance: To assess functional vision for BCD, the MLMT requires adaptation, and clinical trials should incorporate macular structural parameters.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.