Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746128›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2026

Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Not Routinely Measuring Gastric Residual Volume to Guide Enteral Feeding Versus Routine Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Children (GASTRIC-PICU).

Marzena Orzol, Irene Chang, Emma Laing, Mark J Peters, Julia E Edwards, Paloma Ferrando-Vivas, Julie Camsooksai, Jahara Khatun, Lamprini Lampro, Millie Parke and 15 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Marzena OrzolClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6624-5041
Irene ChangClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Emma LaingClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Mark J PetersInfection, Immunity and Inflammation Department, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Julia E EdwardsClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Paloma Ferrando-VivasClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Julie CamsooksaiClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Jahara KhatunClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Lamprini LamproClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Millie ParkeClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Hannah SedgwickClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Carly AuClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
David HarrisonClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Lynne LattenDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Julie MenziesPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Luise V MarinoDepartment of Research and Development, Division - Medical Directorate, South West Yorkshire Partnership Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Field Head Hospital, Wakefield, United Kingdom.
Katherine L BrownPaediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Nigel J HallUniversity Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Kerry WoolfallPublic Health Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Zia SadiqueDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Lewis VealeParent representative, United Kingdom.
Luregn J SchlapbachDepartment of Intensive Care and Neonatology, and Children`s Research Center, University Children`s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paul MounceyClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.
Frederic V VallaNutrition Support Team, Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Lyvonne N TumeDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProviding adequate nutrition is a key aspect of pediatric intensive care, with enteral administration preferred. The regular measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV) to guide feeding is common, but it results in frequent feed interruptions due to a perceived high GRV. The GASTRIC-PICU (GRV to guide enteral feeding vs. routine measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill children) randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of not routinely measuring GRV to guide enteral feeding compared with the usual practice of routine measurement.

designMulticenter, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label clinical trial with embedded health economic evaluation.

settingTwenty-three PICUs across United Kingdom, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland. PATIENTS: Infants and children 37 weeks old or older corrected gestational age to 16 years admitted to participating PICUs, on mechanical ventilation and being enterally fed. INTERVENTION AND COMPARISON: Standard feeding protocols without routinely measuring GRV to guide feeding will be compared against standard feeding protocols with routine (at least 6-hourly) GRV measurement to guide feeding. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsRandomization 1:1 between no routine GRV measurement and routine GRV measurement stratified by site, age at admission, and main reason for admission. "Research Without Prior Consent" will be used. The primary clinical outcome is a composite outcome of survival and days free from mechanical ventilation at 30 days (non-inferiority). The superiority co-primary outcome is the percentage of the child's estimated energy requirements achieved by 72 hours after randomization. The primary outcome of cost-effectiveness analysis is incremental net monetary benefits at 6 months. Baseline demographics and clinical status, daily nutritional data for the first 7 days, and discharge outcome, as well as longer-term survival and economic data will be collected.

conclusionsTrial findings will be disseminated in peer reviewed journals, via international conferences and in lay language via social media.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionRespiration, ArtificialAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicResidual Volumechildcritical careenteral nutritionfeedingneonatepediatric intensive carerandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID41746128
PMCPMC13132076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.