ReviewVaccines2026
A Scoping Review of Influences on HPV Vaccine Uptake in the Rural US.
Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human papillomavirus (HPV) is the leading cause of cervical and oropharyngeal cancers. Vaccination can prevent over 90% of HPV-attributed cancers. Rural populations are less likely to initiate and complete HPV vaccinations than urban. The primary objective of this paper is to systematically examine the multilevel (child/youth, parent/caregiver, physician/team, healthcare organization, community, and policy) influences on HPV vaccine uptake in the rural US population. As a secondary aim, we seek to identify gaps in the research that could contribute to the development of more precise intervention approaches in this population. The study adds to the limited number of recent reviews on rural HPV vaccine uptake in the US.
methodWe conducted a systematic search of published empirical studies over 13 years (2010-2023), resulting in 1657 publications. The following databases were searched: Medline (OVID), Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane, Sociological Abstracts, and Scopus using pre-specified inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently coded 101 full texts; discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. The primary outcome was HPV vaccine uptake.
resultsAdolescents themselves were the most common foci of change. Barriers to rural HPV uptake included limited; vaccine awareness, access to vaccines for children vaccination sites, and primary care recommendations.
conclusionsTailored interventions to rural parents/caregivers could increase uptake of the vaccine. Provider training increases HPV vaccine recommendations; programs should also be targeted to rural school nurses, pharmacists, and dental care providers. Linking primary care practices and public health dissemination strategies are key.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.