ReviewTropical medicine and infectious disease2026
Three Decades of Use of the Minimum Basic Data Set in Infectious Disease Research in Spain: A Scoping Review with an Evidence-Mapping Approach.
Review in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nationwide hospital discharge databases are increasingly used in infectious disease research, yet their methodological strengths and limitations are rarely synthesised. In Spain, the Minimum Basic Data Set (Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos, CMBD) was implemented in 1987 and provides near-universal coverage of acute-care hospitalisations and has been widely applied in infectious disease epidemiology. However, its overall contribution and intrinsic constraints have not been comprehensively mapped. Given the breadth of infections, study designs, populations and outcome definitions in CMBD-based research, effect-size synthesis was not feasible; therefore, we conducted a scoping review with an evidence-mapping approach. We aimed to synthesise the scope, applications and methodological limitations of CMBD-based infectious disease research since its implementation. We conducted a scoping review following JBI guidance and reported according to PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from inception to 25 November 2024 for peer-reviewed journal articles in English or Spanish using CMBD data to investigate infectious diseases in Spain (no restrictions were applied by study design; grey literature was excluded). Screening, data charting and synthesis were completed during 2025. Four reviewers independently screened records and charted data. Studies were classified by infectious disease focus, syndromic category, study design and geographical scope. A total of 359 studies published between 1996 and 2024 were included, mostly retrospective observational analyses. Infectious diseases were the primary focus in 225 studies (62.7%), most commonly respiratory, gastrointestinal/liver and vaccine-preventable infections. Subnational analyses were concentrated in a limited number of regions. Over 80% of reported limitations reflected intrinsic CMBD features. Over three decades, the CMBD has become a cornerstone of hospital-based infectious disease research in Spain, enabling robust national analyses. However, limitations in clinical detail, microbiological confirmation and coding consistency constrain aetiological specificity and causal inference, highlighting the need for data validation and linkage with complementary sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.