Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745958›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2026

Evaluation of Productivity and Egg Quality in Japanese Quails Reared Under Different LED Colors and Rearing Systems.

Paitoon Kaewhom, Kraiyot Saelim, Patcharawadee Poolsamran, Chanathip Thammakarn, Chanporn Chaosap, Rasheed Olayiwola Sulaimon, Panneepa Sivapirunthep, Kanokrat Srikijkasemwat

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paitoon KaewhomFaculty of Agricultural Technology, Burapha University, Sakaeo Campus, Sa Kaeo 27160, Thailand.
Kraiyot SaelimFaculty of Agricultural Technology, Burapha University, Sakaeo Campus, Sa Kaeo 27160, Thailand.
Patcharawadee PoolsamranDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chon Buri 20131, Thailand.
Chanathip ThammakarnDepartment of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Chanporn ChaosapDepartment of Agricultural Education, School of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang Bangkok 10520, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3816-1884
Rasheed Olayiwola SulaimonDepartment of Agricultural Education, School of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang Bangkok 10520, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2451-0019
Panneepa SivapirunthepDepartment of Agricultural Education, School of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang Bangkok 10520, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7126-2732
Kanokrat SrikijkasemwatDepartment of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0762-6412

Funding

This research was funded by Burapha University and Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) 32/2565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the productivity and egg quality of Japanese quails reared under different LED colors and rearing systems. A total of 720 female quails were assigned to a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement with three LED colors (red, green, and white) and two rearing systems (cage and floor) until 20 weeks of age. Production performance was evaluated across specific age intervals, while physical egg quality traits were analyzed using a Repeated-measures General Linear Model to assess temporal changes. No significant overall interactions between LED color and rearing system were observed (

Indexed as

avian reproductionegg productionlaying performancephoto stimulationproduction performance

Identifiers

PMID41745958
PMCPMC12944857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.