ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Ultrasound-Guided Mandibular Alveolar Nerve Block in Rabbits: A Cadaveric Comparison of In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Approaches.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular dental disease is common in pet rabbits and often requires invasive procedures associated with significant nociceptive input. Mandibular alveolar nerve blocks have been described in this species using blind techniques; however, their accuracy has not been objectively evaluated, and ultrasound-guided approaches have not been reported. This cadaveric study aimed to describe an ultrasound-guided mandibular alveolar nerve block in rabbits and to compare in-plane and out-of-plane approaches. Twelve adult New Zealand White rabbit cadavers (24 mandibular alveolar nerves) were included. For each rabbit, one nerve was assigned to an in-plane ultrasound-guided approach, while the contralateral nerve was assigned to an out-of-plane approach. Following ultrasound-guided needle placement, 0.1 mL/kg of a mixture of 2% lidocaine and 1% methylene blue was injected. Ultrasound image quality and perineural staining were assessed and scored, and longitudinal dye spread was measured after anatomical dissection. Both approaches allowed consistent identification of the target region and resulted in comparable ultrasound image quality scores, staining scores, and longitudinal dye spread, with no statistically significant differences between techniques. These results demonstrate the anatomical feasibility of ultrasound-guided mandibular alveolar nerve blocks in rabbits using either approach. Further in vivo studies are required to assess clinical efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.