Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745854›Full record

ReviewToxics2026

Exploring Sulpiride as an Alternative to Testosterone Propionate for Inducing Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Rodent Models.

Solomon Owumi, Esther M Pius, Hikmah A Abdulganiyu, Ifeoluwa O Alabi, Victor O Eso, Abdullah A Sanusi, Oluwaseun M Owolabi, Uche O Arunsi, Jesutosin O Babalola, Moses T Otunla and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Solomon OwumiCancer Research and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-0376
Esther M PiusCancer Research and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0007-0524-592X
Hikmah A AbdulganiyuCancer Research and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0001-9469-0465
Ifeoluwa O AlabiCancer Research and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0005-5257-5548
Victor O EsoCancer Research and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0004-8413-6024
Abdullah A SanusiCancer Research and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0006-5131-0502
Oluwaseun M OwolabiCancer Research and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0005-3800-3041
Uche O ArunsiSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5315-2695
Jesutosin O BabalolaNutrition and Industrial Biochemistry Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Moses T OtunlaDepartment of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7721-7238
Ayomide P AkomolafeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Centre, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1643-2647
Emiola O Olapade-OlaopaDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200004, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-0927
Adegboyega K OyelereSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-9551
Olorunseun O OgunwobiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Chima M AmadiDedra Nutraceuticals and Biotechnology Initiative, Garki 900024, Abuja FCT, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a significant health issue among ageing men, with ongoing research focused on elucidating its underlying mechanisms and improving experimental models. Testosterone Propionate (TP) is the first line of choice for the induction of BPH in experimental rodent models. However, TP's controlled status as a Schedule III drug in the United States and a Class C drug in the UK presents challenges in obtaining TP for experimental use, giving preference to the sulpiride model since it is easily obtained as an alternative for the induction and study of BPH. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The primary PubMed search strategy included combinations of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms: ("Benign prostatic hyperplasia induction" OR "and rodent models'') AND ("Testosterone Propionate model") AND ("sulpiride model"). Studies were included if they induced BPH (using testosterone or sulpiride models). Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance; eligible articles underwent full-text review, with data extracted thematically. No formal risk-of-bias scoring was used due to the narrative approach; instead, studies were appraised by design, rigor, plausibility, and evidence. This study reviewed published and publicly available data, so no ethical approval was required. Although both TP and sulpiride induce BPH via various mechanisms, this review provides a comparative analysis of these two commonly utilised models for studying BPH. In the TP approach, castrated rodents receive daily subcutaneous injections for 4 weeks, resulting in dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-mediated epithelial hyperplasia predominantly affecting the ventral prostate lobes. Conversely, the sulpiride model is non-invasive, employs intact animals treated with sulpiride, and induces hyperprolactinemia-mediated BPH via interactions with androgen and oestrogen receptor pathways that stimulate prostatic stromal and epithelial proliferation, particularly in the lateral and dorsal lobes, representing an alternative method. We also highlight the strengths and limitations of TP and sulpiride in replicating clinical symptoms and examine the toxicological effects of sulpiride on the kidney, testis, liver, and brain. We recommend the sulpiride model for the induction and studying of BPH, as it is readily accessible and closely mimics the pathogenesis of BPH in humans, unlike the TP model, which requires castration.

Indexed as

androgen receptorbenign prostatic hyperplasiahyperprolactinemiarodent modelssulpiridetestosterone propionate

Identifiers

PMID41745854
PMCPMC12945056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.