Trial reportToxins2026
Efficacy and Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Blepharospasm: A Multicenter, Phase 3 Study in Japan.
Trial report in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This open-label, uncontrolled, single-arm, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in Japanese patients with blepharospasm. Eligible patients received incobotulinumtoxinA injections at fixed doses (50, 75, or 100 units [U] for those who had previously received botulinum toxin treatment; 50 U for treatment-naïve patients), followed by flexible doses up to 100 U for 48 weeks, with at least 6-week intervals. In total, 29 Japanese patients were enrolled (26 [89.7%] women, mean age 64.6 years, mean baseline Jankovic Rating Scale [JRS] severity score 3.24). The primary endpoint, the least squares mean of change in JRS severity scores from baseline to 6 weeks after the first injection, was -2.08 (95% confidence interval: -2.49, -1.66), meeting the prespecified efficacy criteria. The secondary endpoint results (JRS severity, frequency, and total scores for 48 weeks; Blepharospasm Disability Index; Patient Evaluation of Global Response; and fast blinking test) supported the efficacy of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 19 (65.5%) patients, with eyelid ptosis being the most common treatment-related AE (4 [13.8%] patients). No severe or serious AEs were reported. IncobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated sustained efficacy in Japanese patients with blepharospasm, without new safety concerns. (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier, jRCT2031230711).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.