Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745765›Full record

ArticleToxins2026

Cross-Induction of Anti-Complexing Antibodies in Patients Treated with Botulinum Toxin Formulations Containing Complexing Proteins.

Yuttana Srinoulprasert, Surachet Sirisuthivoranunt, Chattip Sripatumtong, Tunsuda Tansit, Pornsuk Yamlexnoi, Onjira Meethong, Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuttana SrinoulprasertDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3004-5771
Surachet SirisuthivoranuntDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Chattip SripatumtongDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Tunsuda TansitDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Pornsuk YamlexnoiDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Onjira MeethongDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Rungsima WanitphakdeedechaDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3926-2193

Funding

Mahidol University N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) formulations differ in their content of non-toxic accessory proteins, also known as complexing proteins (CPs), which may influence immunogenicity. Some BoNT/A products share structurally similar CPs, potentially leading to antibody cross-reactivity among formulations. This prospective study investigated whether patients treated with different BoNT/A products develop cross-reactive anti-CP antibody responses. One hundred participants were allocated into five treatment groups, each receiving a single BoNT/A formulation: incobotulinumtoxinA (IncoA), onabotulinumtoxinA (OnaA), abobotulinumtoxinA (AboA), letibotulinumtoxinA (LetiA), or prabotulinumtoxinA (PraboA). Each participant received 50 units or equivalent dosing. Serum samples were collected 180 days post-injection, and anti-CP antibodies were quantified using an absorption ELISA and compared with a toxin-naïve control group. IncoA did not induce significant anti-CP antibody responses. In contrast, higher antibody levels were observed in the OnaA, LetiA, and PraboA groups against multiple CPs, suggesting structural similarity and cross-reactivity. AboA primarily induced antibodies directed against its own CPs and those of PraboA. These findings demonstrate that CP-containing formulations can induce cross-reactive antibody responses, whereas CP-free incobotulinumtoxinA exhibits minimal immunogenicity. This study highlights the importance of CP composition in guiding clinical product selection, particularly in patients requiring repeated BoNT/A administration.

Indexed as

botulinum toxin type Acomplexing proteinscross-reactive antibodiesimmunogenicity

Identifiers

PMID41745765
PMCPMC12945223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.