ReviewToxins2026
The Cardioprotective Potential of Marine Venom and Toxins.
Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the primary cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic alternatives. In recent years, marine ecosystems have garnered increasing attention as a promising source of bioactive compounds with unique structural and pharmacological properties. Marine-derived toxins and venoms, including tetrodotoxin, ω-conotoxins, anthopleurins, palytoxin, brevetoxin, aplysiatoxin, and asterosaponins, exert cardioprotective effects through diverse mechanisms such as modulation of ion channels, inhibition of sympathetic overactivity, antioxidative actions, and enhancement of myocardial contractility. These properties make them potential candidates for addressing various CVD manifestations, including arrhythmia, hypertension, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and heart failure. However, despite their therapeutic promise, the clinical application of these marine compounds remains limited due to poor tissue selectivity, narrow therapeutic indices, proinflammatory activity, and limited metabolic stability. Structural modifications, advanced drug delivery platforms, and in vivo validation studies are crucial for overcoming these challenges. This review highlights the pharmacological actions, molecular targets, and cardiovascular relevance of selected marine toxins and venoms while also addressing key translational barriers. Advances in biotechnology and peptide engineering are enabling the safer and more targeted use of these compounds. Collectively, marine-derived toxins and venoms represent a largely untapped but highly promising frontier in cardiovascular drug discovery. Strategic research focused on elucidating mechanisms, optimizing delivery, and translating clinical applications will be critical to unlocking their full therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.