Clinical Image Quality and Reader Variability in 3D Synthetic Brain MRI Compared with Conventional MRI.

Alexander von Hessling, Chloé Sieber, Maria Blatow, Christian Berner, Dirk Lehnick, Frauke Kellner-Weldon

Abstract readComparative Study

In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander von HesslingSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neurocenter, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, University Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5091-3228

Chloé SieberFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6642-5082

Maria BlatowSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neurocenter, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, University Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3371-5697

Christian BernerSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neurocenter, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, University Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.

Dirk LehnickFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1836-2811

Frauke Kellner-WeldonSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neurocenter, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, University Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-0147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BrainImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedArtifactsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise Ratio3D-QALAS3D synthetic imagingquantitative magnetic resonance imagingrelaxometrysynthetic imagingsynthetic magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID41745690

DOI10.3390/tomography12020013

PMCPMC12945194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.