ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
One-Year Clinical Performance of Injectable and Paste-Type Composite Resins in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Acid Etching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How laser etching affects the clinical performance of a "no-wait" universal adhesive: 36-month results.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Role of lasers in restorative dentistry: a review and update.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesNon-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are common defects in adults that can lead to dentin hypersensitivity and aesthetic concerns, for which composite resin restorations currently represent the gold standard of care. However, evidence regarding the long-term clinical superiority of high-filled injectable composites and Er,Cr:YSGG laser-based cavity preparation remains limited. The present study aimed to compare the 1-year clinical performance of two different surface preparation protocols (Er,Cr:YSGG laser vs. conventional bur preparation with phosphoric acid etching) and two composite resin types (high-filled injectable vs. conventional paste-type) in the restoration of NCCLs.
methodsIn this prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial, a total of 168 NCCLs in 27 patients were restored. Lesions were randomly allocated to four groups according to the combination of surface preparation (Er,Cr:YSGG laser or phosphoric acid etching) and high-filled injectable composite (G-ænial Universal Injectable) or paste-type composite (G-ænial Anterior). The same universal adhesive system was used in all cases. Clinical evaluations were performed by a blinded examiner at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months, using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria.
resultsAt the 1-year follow-up, 25 patients and 150 restorations were available for evaluation, corresponding to a recall rate of 98.22%. High clinical acceptability was observed in all groups with respect to aesthetic, functional, and biological parameters. Retention was 100% in the acid-etched paste-type composite group and ranged from 94.7% to 97.4% in the remaining groups, with no statistically significant differences among groups (
conclusionsHigh-filled injectable composites demonstrated 1-year clinical performance comparable to that of conventional paste-type composites in the restoration of NCCLs. Er,Cr: YSGG laser-based cavity conditioning produced outcomes similar to conventional phosphoric acid etching with respect to retention, marginal adaptation, and biological compatibility. The early increase in laser-related postoperative sensitivity was transient and did not compromise long-term clinical success. Taken together, the ease of application and favorable clinical performance of injectable composites indicate that these materials constitute a reliable alternative for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.