Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745561›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026

Dental Implantation Changes the Bone Morphology and Mineral Density of Human Mandibular Condyle: A Pilot Study.

Ian Segall, Mark Finkelstein, Sonya Kalim, Jinju Kim, Nicholas Jones, Zachary Skabelund, Hong Chen, Hany A Emam, Lisa Knobloch, Do-Gyoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ian SegallDivision of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Mark FinkelsteinDivision of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Sonya KalimWorkman School of Dental Medicine, High Point University, High Point, NC 27262, USA.
Jinju KimDivision of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Nicholas JonesDivision of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Zachary SkabelundDivision of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Hong ChenDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Hany A EmamDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Anesthesiology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Lisa KnoblochDivision of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Do-Gyoon KimDivision of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7673-1254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental implantation affects masticatory bite and muscle forces. The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) bears a substantial amount of these masticatory forces. Thus, the objective of the current study was to investigate whether dental implantation alters the human mandibular condyle. Among 556 images, 54 and 22 CBCT scans were successfully identified from 27 patients (10 males and 17 females; 54.93 ± 19.46 years) in the control group and 11 patients (3 males and 8 females; 51.32 ± 13.13 years) in the implant group, respectively. In the control group, CBCT images were obtained longitudinally at the time of implantation and after the post-implantation healing period, both prior to crown placement. In the implant group, CBCT images were obtained at the time of crown placement on a single-tooth implant and after the functional loading period following crown placement. Left and right mandibular condyles were digitally isolated from the images. The bone mineral density (BMD) parameters and morphological changes were assessed using frequency plots of BMD and TMJ osteoarthritis (OA) counts, respectively. In the control group, BMD values were not significantly different between the first and second scans. In contrast, the implant group showed a significant decrease in BMD values, along with a marginal increase in TMJ OA counts after the functional loading period. The TMJ OA counts were highest in the anterior regions, followed by the middle and posterior regions. Most regions showed significantly reduced BMD values, except the antero-lateral and antero-central regions. The current findings give an insight that dental implantation may alter the morphology and BMD of human mandibular condyles. The TMJ OA counts increased, while BMD decreased during the functional loading period of more than 3 months following implantation. Masticatory loading associated with the dental implant likely increases the load on the TMJ, which could stimulate new bone formation to balance the load distribution on the mandibular condyle.

Indexed as

bone mineral densitycone beam computed tomographydental implantationmandibular condyletemporomandibular joint

Identifiers

PMID41745561
PMCPMC12941467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.