ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026
A Systematic Review on Artificial Liver for Implantation.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic liver disease remains a leading cause of global mortality, yet organ shortages and transplant complications limit the efficacy of orthotopic liver transplantation. While extracorporeal support systems serve as temporary bridges, they fail to restore long-term patient autonomy or replicate complex biosynthetic functions. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, evaluates recent advancements in implantable artificial livers (IALs) designed for permanent functional integration. We analyzed 71 eligible studies, assessing cellular sources, fabrication strategies, maturation processes, and functional readiness. Our findings indicate significant progress in stem-cell-derived hepatocytes and bioactive scaffolds, such as decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM). However, a critical technological gap remains in scaling current sub-centimeter prototypes toward clinically relevant volumes (~200 mL). Key engineering challenges include integrating hierarchical vascular networks, requiring primary vessels exceeding 2 mm in diameter for surgical anastomosis, and functional biliary systems to prevent cholestatic injury. Furthermore, while micro-vascularization and protein synthesis are well documented, higher-order functions such as spatial zonation and coordinated metabolic stability remain underreported. Future clinical translation necessitates advancements in multi-cellular patterning, microfluidic-driven maturation, and autologous reprogramming. This review provides a comprehensive roadmap for bridging the gap between biofabricated constructs and organ-scale hepatic replacement, emphasizing the need for standardized functional benchmarks to ensure long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.