Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745500›Full record

ArticleMembranes2026

Pilot-Scale Evaluation of Flat-Sheet Membrane Bioreactor for In Situ Retrofitting Textile Dyeing Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Chaoqun Zhou, Chunhai Wei, Huarong Yu, Hongwei Rong, Kang Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaoqun ZhouDepartment of Municipal Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Chunhai WeiDepartment of Municipal Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4336-8556
Huarong YuDepartment of Municipal Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Hongwei RongDepartment of Municipal Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Kang XiaoBeijing Yanshan Earth Critical Zone National Research Station, College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6475-1960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is promising to in situ retrofit the activated sludge process with a membrane bioreactor (MBR) to increase treatment capacity and improve effluent quality in a textile dyeing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Membrane selection among commercial products for real engineering applications is critical for this specific wastewater, and little information is available in the literature. This study systematically evaluated the application potential of two flat-sheet microfiltration membranes made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyether sulfone (PES) in pilot-scale MBRs for in situ retrofitting textile dyeing WWTP. During the four stages with different loads, both membranes achieved nearly the same effluent quality and rejection performance. Both membranes showed little trans-membrane pressure (TMP) increase at an average flux of 15 L/(m

Indexed as

chromacolloidscontact anglemacromolecular organicsmembrane foulingpermeabilityreverse osmosis pretreatmentturbiditywastewater reusezeta potential

Identifiers

PMID41745500
PMCPMC12942177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.