ReviewMembranes2026
Structural Design and Performance Optimization of Proton Exchange Membranes for Water Electrolysis: A Review.
Review in Membranes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trade-off between the ionic conductivity and the stability of the proton exchange membrane (PEM) is a major concern in the development of PEM water electrolysis (PEMWE). This review focuses on the design and fabrication of homogeneous and composite PEMs for water electrolysis and establishes the structure-performance relationships between the membrane chemical/physical structures and their efficiency metrics-specifically, proton conductivity, hydrogen permeability, and chemical and mechanical stability. A special focus is placed on the fundamental connection between the microstructure and performance of membrane materials. At the molecular level, we systematically illustrate the design principles for main chains, side chains, and sulfonate groups, covering both fluorinated PEMs (encompassing perfluorinated and partially fluorinated membranes) and non-fluorinated PEMs (including aromatic polymers with heteroatom backbones and all-carbon backbones). At the macroscopic level, the review provides an in-depth exploration of two primary modification strategies: creating composites with organic polymers and with inorganic nanofillers. In summary, this review elucidates how these composite approaches leverage material synergies to improve the membrane's mechanical integrity, proton conduction efficiency, and chemical resistance and offers a theoretical framework for the rational design of next-generation, high-performance PEMs to advance the commercialization of PEMWE technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.