ReviewJournal of imaging2026
A Survey of Crop Disease Recognition Methods Based on Spectral and RGB Images.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EDISP: a hybrid CNN-ViT framework for robust maize leaf disease detection and classification.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major crops worldwide are affected by various diseases yearly, leading to crop losses in different regions. The primary methods for addressing crop disease losses include manual inspection and chemical control. However, traditional manual inspection methods are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and require specialized knowledge. The preemptive use of chemicals also poses a risk of soil pollution, which may cause irreversible damage. With the advancement of computer hardware, photographic technology, and artificial intelligence, crop disease recognition methods based on spectral and red-green-blue (RGB) images not only recognize diseases without damaging the crops but also offer high accuracy and speed of recognition, essentially solving the problems associated with manual inspection and chemical control. This paper summarizes the research on disease recognition methods based on spectral and RGB images, with the literature spanning from 2020 through early 2025. Unlike previous surveys, this paper reviews recent advances involving emerging paradigms such as State Space Models (e.g., Mamba) and Generative AI in the context of crop disease recognition. In addition, it introduces public datasets and commonly used evaluation metrics for crop disease identification. Finally, the paper discusses potential issues and solutions encountered during research, including the use of diffusion models for data augmentation. Hopefully, this survey will help readers understand the current methods and effectiveness of crop disease detection, inspiring the development of more effective methods to assist farmers in identifying crop diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.