ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Demographic Mix of Care Homes and Personalised Use of SGLT-2 Inhibitors and GLP-1RAs in Residents with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes prevalence in older people residing in care homes is rising. This cohort of patients is characterised by multiple morbidities, polypharmacy, and frailty. As a result, they are exposed to an increasing burden of hypoglycaemia, which leads to unnecessary hospital visits and negative consequences. In addition, due to their high baseline morbidities, the risk of cardiovascular events increases. The newly introduced therapy of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA has a very low risk of hypoglycaemia and a significant cardiovascular protective effect. This makes it an appealing choice to be used in older people with complex morbidities, such as care home residents. So far, the current use of these agents is suboptimal in these settings because clinicians are cautious of side effects and tolerability, and also, clinical studies have not included this population. Furthermore, the guidelines in this area lack a personalised approach and are too general, with no clear specific description of which patients are suitable for such therapy. The currently available little evidence is indirect, which confirms the superior benefits of such therapy in frail compared with robust subjects, especially in those who are overweight or obese. The demographic mix of care homes is largely heterogeneous in terms of variations in body composition. In addition to malnourished, frail phenotype subjects, the prevalence of individuals with obesity living in these settings is increasing. Therefore, there is scope for increased use of these new agents in residents who have at least a normal or higher body weight. Because of the high baseline cardiovascular risk, these patients will benefit most from such therapy. Otherwise, these agents are better when less used for frail patients who are anorexic and malnourished because of the risk of inducing further weight loss, volume loss, low blood pressure, falls, and fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.