ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Across the Heart Failure Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Exploration of the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) affects 32 million people worldwide and is responsible for tens of billions of dollars in healthcare expenditure annually, with costs primarily driven by hospitalizations. HFpEF is notoriously difficult to treat, but emerging studies suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may be effective therapies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials with 5564 total participants investigating GLP-1 RAs in patients with HFpEF. Overall, no significant effect was noted for GLP-1 RAs on our primary outcomes of cardiovascular mortality and worsening heart failure (HF) events, although they were associated with improvement in quality of life measures. Furthermore, safety data favored the GLP-1 RA group, although tolerability did not differ compared with placebo. While the pooled analysis of all GLP-1 RAs showed neutral effects versus hard endpoints, sensitivity analyses excluding older-generation agents (exenatide) revealed a significant 41% reduction in HF events, suggesting that newer, more potent agents (semaglutide, tirzepatide) may offer disease-modifying benefits in HFpEF. Although future studies are needed, GLP-1 RAs appear to be promising for the treatment of HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.