ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Preventing Postpericardiotomy Syndrome: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) is the most frequent inflammatory after-effect of cardiac surgery and is characterized by high morbidity, delayed hospitalization, and increased long-term mortality rates. Although PPS is common, empirical anti-inflammatory therapy has historically been employed for its prevention, and mechanism-based approaches have not yet been standardized. In this literature review, which was conducted on the basis of randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, cohort studies, and mechanistic research regarding pharmacologic interventions, surgical modalities, and biomarker-based preventive strategies, the deficiencies of a critical synthesis of existing preventive strategies and emerging risk stratification instruments for PPS are addressed. The review affirms that the most evidence-based pharmacologic intervention is colchicine, which demonstrates a consistent reduction in PPS incidence across a range of randomized trials. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs show variable responses, whereas corticosteroids are no longer recommended for routine prophylaxis due to relapse. Specific anti-interleukin-1 therapies represent a promising novel approach for high-risk patients. Surgical interventions, such as pericardial closure using biomaterials and posterior pericardiotomy, are important and do not lead to increased hemodynamic complications, while postoperative effusions, atrial fibrillation, and tamponade are reduced. Less invasive methods may also be employed to mitigate inflammatory causes, particularly in valve-sparing procedures and congenital operations. Emerging biomarker data, including postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, C-reactive protein levels, and pericardial fluid cytokines, enable the identification of high-risk patients and form the basis for a personalized prevention approach. In summary, pharmacologic prophylaxis, innovative surgical techniques, and biomarker-based risk stratification represent a pathway toward reducing the incidence and burden of PPS in modern cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.