ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fungi and Stone Heritage Conservation: Friend, Foe, or a Bit of Both.
Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The presence of lithobionts has historically been associated with biodeterioration, posing significant challenges to the conservation of culturally and historically significant stone heritage. This perception stems from abundant evidence of their role in biogeophysical processes, such as mechanical disruption of stone structures, and biogeochemical processes, which chemically alter stone composition through metabolic activity. These processes, while integral to natural systems, often accelerate the weathering and deterioration of heritage materials. Coupled with the aesthetic impact of lithobiont growth, frequently resulting in discoloration or obscuring of intricate details, such effects have justified the widespread removal of these organisms from heritage surfaces. However, recent research has revealed a far more nuanced picture. These communities can enhance biodiversity, contribute to the perceived authenticity of aged monuments, and, in some cases, form a biological layer that shields stone from pollutants and weathering forces. Moreover, developments in biomediated conservation approaches, such as biocementation and biocleaning, highlight their potential as sustainable allies in preservation. This dual role of lithobionts-both as friends and foes in preservation-is central to this review. This review focuses on how these organisms-with a particular emphasis on fungi, often perceived as enemies of conservation-may also serve as unexpected partners in safeguarding our stone heritage, emphasizing the need for case-by-case evaluation of active communities and their environmental context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.