ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Bridging Digital Learning Competence and Academic Achievement: The Roles of Informal Digital Learning and Metacognitive Self-Regulation.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reflection at Night: Exploring University Students' Cognitions Regarding Nighttime Destination Authenticity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The impact of learning engagement on learning outcomes among public administration majors: the mediating role of digital literacy and the moderating role of AI tool acceptance.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Profile analysis of college students' AI literacy and cognitive flexibility and its correlation with deep learning ability.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The digital transformation of clinical teaching: a review of AI and data-driven quality assurance systems in medical education.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Emotional intelligence and self-regulated learning: psychological pathways to student engagement and academic performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The author investigates how digital learning competence (DLC) is bridged to academic achievement (AA) through informal digital learning engagement (IDLE) and how meta-cognitive self-regulation (MSR) shapes these pathways among university students. Grounded in a moderated mediation framework, this research conceptualizes DLC not as a static skill set but as a latent capacity that is channeled into academic outcomes when students autonomously engage in digital environments and regulate their cognition. Survey data were collected from 432 undergraduate students and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that DLC significantly predicts AA both directly and indirectly via IDLE, identifying informal digital learning engagement as a central pathway through which digital learning competence is translated into academic gains. Furthermore, MSR moderates the relationship between DLC and IDLE, such that higher levels of metacognitive self-regulation strengthen the conversion of digital learning competence into productive informal digital learning engagement. These findings support a dynamic view of digital learning competence and underscore the roles of learner autonomy and metacognitive awareness in transforming digital skills into meaningful educational outcomes. By integrating perspectives on digital literacy, self-regulated learning, and informal learning, this study offers implications for the design of digital learning ecosystems that effectively bridge students' digital capacities with their academic achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.