Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41745142›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Application of Nanomaterials in the Deacidification of Paper-Based Cultural Heritage.

Chun Kong, Jinxiu Song, Yu Tong, Tao Chen, Sheng Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chun KongCentre for the Protection of Cultural Property, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo 315175, China.
Jinxiu SongCentre for the Protection of Cultural Property, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo 315175, China.
Yu TongCentre for the Protection of Cultural Property, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo 315175, China.
Tao ChenInstitute of Tribology, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China.
Sheng ChenCentre for the Protection of Cultural Property, Ningbo University of Finance & Economics, Ningbo 315175, China.ORCID 0009-0001-8049-9571

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Education Department Y202559103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acidity is a primary factor leading to the deterioration of paper-based cultural heritage, and deacidification treatment is a crucial preventive conservation measure for extending their lifespan. Traditional deacidification techniques, such as the particle suspension method and vapor phase method, have limitations in terms of penetration uniformity, treatment efficacy, or safety. Nanoscale alkaline materials, represented by nano-calcium hydroxide and nano-magnesium hydroxide, offer an innovative solution with the potential to achieve more uniform, efficient, and long-lasting paper deacidification, owing to their high specific surface area, enhanced reactivity, and superior penetration capacity derived from the nanoscale dimension. It is important to note that the realized uniformity and depth of treatment are contingent upon substrate properties (e.g., fiber density, porosity) and application parameters. This paper provides a systematic review of the main types of nanomaterials applied in the deacidification of paper artifacts-including their synthesis and dispersion stabilization methods-application techniques (such as immersion and spraying) and performance evaluation systems (including pH value, alkaline reserve, and mechanical properties). Through comparative analysis and case studies, the advantages and current challenges of nano-deacidification technology are elaborated. Finally, future directions for nano-deacidification technology are discussed, particularly focusing on material optimization, standardized evaluation, and prospects for scalable application tailored to the practical needs of cultural heritage conservation.

Indexed as

alkaline reservecultural heritage conservationdeacidificationnanomaterialspaper-based cultural heritage

Identifiers

PMID41745142
PMCPMC12943267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.