ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Application of Nanomaterials in the Deacidification of Paper-Based Cultural Heritage.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transforming Nanomaterials Development with Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acidity is a primary factor leading to the deterioration of paper-based cultural heritage, and deacidification treatment is a crucial preventive conservation measure for extending their lifespan. Traditional deacidification techniques, such as the particle suspension method and vapor phase method, have limitations in terms of penetration uniformity, treatment efficacy, or safety. Nanoscale alkaline materials, represented by nano-calcium hydroxide and nano-magnesium hydroxide, offer an innovative solution with the potential to achieve more uniform, efficient, and long-lasting paper deacidification, owing to their high specific surface area, enhanced reactivity, and superior penetration capacity derived from the nanoscale dimension. It is important to note that the realized uniformity and depth of treatment are contingent upon substrate properties (e.g., fiber density, porosity) and application parameters. This paper provides a systematic review of the main types of nanomaterials applied in the deacidification of paper artifacts-including their synthesis and dispersion stabilization methods-application techniques (such as immersion and spraying) and performance evaluation systems (including pH value, alkaline reserve, and mechanical properties). Through comparative analysis and case studies, the advantages and current challenges of nano-deacidification technology are elaborated. Finally, future directions for nano-deacidification technology are discussed, particularly focusing on material optimization, standardized evaluation, and prospects for scalable application tailored to the practical needs of cultural heritage conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.