ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Microbiota Transplantation as a Future Novel Therapeutic Strategy Approach.
Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The interventional value and research progress of vaginal microbiota transplantation in improving female sexual quality of life associated with dysbiosis of the reproductive microecosystem.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Vaginal Microecological Imbalance, Human Papillomavirus Infection, and Cervical Carcinogenesis: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Intratumoral microbiome: a key regulator and novel therapeutic target for chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a leading cause of genital discomfort among women globally, and it arises from dysbiosis of the vaginal ecosystem characterized by the overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria. Current therapeutic strategies primarily rely on antibiotics and/or probiotics, which demonstrate clinical efficacy but are frequently associated with limitations such as antimicrobial resistance, high recurrence rates, and incomplete restoration of a healthy vaginal microbiota. Inspired by the success of fecal microbiota transplantation in gastrointestinal disorders, vaginal microbiome transplantation (VMT) from healthy donors has emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic approach for BV. However, experimental and early clinical studies indicate that VMT efficacy is not uniform across individuals, with considerable inter-individual variability in treatment outcomes. Host genetic factors, baseline vaginal microbial composition, immune status, and environmental influences are likely to modulate therapeutic success, underscoring the need for personalized interventions. This article critically evaluates the shortcomings of existing standardized treatments, highlights the potential advantages and challenges of VMT, and discusses emerging, precision-based therapeutic strategies for BV in light of recent research advances and ongoing clinical trials worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.