ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026
Contributions of Clinical Simulation to Group Cohesion: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning Autonomy and Group Cohesion in Clinical Simulation: A Quasi-Experimental Comparison of Two Training Approaches.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: The complexity of today's healthcare system requires the formation of highly cohesive work teams that guarantee safe and high-quality care. Clinical simulation has become established as a pedagogical strategy capable of promoting the collaborative skills of teams of students and healthcare professionals. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of learning through clinical simulation on group cohesion in nursing student teams. (2) Methods: A pre-post quasi-experimental study without a control group was conducted with final-year nursing students using the short Spanish version of the Group Environment Questionnaire, validated for nursing students. This questionnaire was administered twice, before and after participation in clinical simulation sessions. (3) Results: Clinical simulation significantly increased group cohesion in most items and in all dimensions with moderate to large effect sizes (r > 0.5). The Group Integration-Task (GI-T) dimension showed the greatest improvement after clinical simulation. Although causal relationships cannot be established, the results suggest an association between exposure to clinical simulation and increased group cohesion. (4) Conclusions: Clinical simulation was associated with significant improvements in both task-oriented and social dimensions of group cohesion among nursing students. These findings suggest that clinical simulation may enhance collaboration, communication, and commitment to shared goals within student teams. Future studies including control groups are needed to confirm these associations and further explore the impact of clinical simulation on team performance in both student and healthcare professional contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.