ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effect of Different Reinforcing Fibers on the Properties of Phenolic Aerogel Composites.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Research Status, Key Technologies, and Future Prospects of High-Flame-Retardant, Low-Powdering Phenolic Boards.Polymers · 2026Review
- Tensile and Ablation Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Si-Modified Phenolic Aerogel Composites.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of aerospace technology towards hypersonic vehicles, the synergistic demand for lightweighting and high-efficiency thermal insulation performance of ablation-resistant thermal insulation materials is becoming increasingly urgent. In this study, nanoporous phenolic resin was used as the matrix to prepare quartz fiber-reinforced phenolic aerogel composites (QF/PF), mullite fiber-reinforced phenolic aerogel composites (MF/PF), and carbon fiber-reinforced phenolic aerogel composites (CF/PF), and the influence mechanisms of different reinforcing fibers on the properties of the composites were systematically investigated. QF/PF exhibits optimal thermal insulation performance with a thermal conductivity of 0.1 W/(m·K) at 20-200 °C, followed by MF/PF with a thermal conductivity of 0.11 W/(m·K). Relatively weak thermal insulation performance is demonstrated in CF/PF, whose thermal conductivity reaches 0.14 W/(m·K). However, in terms of mechanical properties, CF/PF is outstanding, with a tensile strength of 54.62 MPa and a bending strength of 29.69 MPa. In addition, the most excellent ablation resistance is displayed in CF/PF, with a linear ablation rate of 0.13 mm/s and a mass ablation rate of 0.0435 g/s, which are significantly lower than QF/PF and MF/PF. This study provides an important basis for the selection of reinforcing fibers in different application scenarios. QF/PF or MF/PF is preferred for high thermal insulation requirements. CF/PF is favored for high load-bearing requirements or extreme ablative environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.