ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Root Cause Analysis of Omissions and Delays in the Initiation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Eligible Patients with Breast Cancer in British Columbia, Canada.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with high-risk breast cancers may benefit from receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to reduce tumour size and allow for breast conserving surgery. Response to NACT also informs prognosis and broadens adjuvant treatment options. According to international guidelines, NACT should commence within 28 days of diagnosis. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients eligible for NACT at a Canadian provincial cancer centre to determine the incidence and root causes of omission or delay in initiation of NACT. Of 100 patients eligible for NACT, 73 received it, while 7 were not referred to medical oncology for consideration of NACT. Of the 73 patients who received NACT, only 15 (21%) started treatment within 28 days of diagnosis. The median diagnosis-to-NACT wait time was 40 days [IQR 30-53]. Of 54 delayed cases, 39 (72%) were due to patients waiting 21 days or more for a medical oncology consultation. Lack of, or delays in medical oncology consultation are the most prominent causes of both NACT omissions and delays. Improving triage of patients potentially eligible for NACT to medical oncology may be an effective intervention to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.