Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744847›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

Patient Journey for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Optimal Care Pathways vs. Reality of Care in Italian Breast Units.

Nicla La Verde, Luisa Brogonzoli, Maria Silvia Cona, Laura Cortesi, Elisabetta Iannelli, Eva Massari, Pietro Panizza, Roberto Papa, Maria Carmela Piccirillo, Elisa Sala and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nicla La VerdeDepartment of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2884-1632
Luisa BrogonzoliThe Bridge Foundation, 20144 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-0510-3559
Maria Silvia ConaDepartment of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1838-7819
Laura CortesiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8950-8561
Elisabetta IannelliItalian Federation of Volunteer-Based Cancer Organisations (FAVO), 00187 Rome, Italy.
Eva MassariThe Bridge Foundation, 20144 Milan, Italy.
Pietro PanizzaBreast Imaging Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Roberto PapaDepartment of Staff, University Hospital of Marche Region, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Maria Carmela PiccirilloClinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9519-4757
Elisa SalaThe Bridge Foundation, 20144 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-1635-5692
Valerio Mattia ScandaliHospital Medical Management, University Hospital of Marche Region, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Adele SgarellaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Laura ValentiniThe Bridge Foundation, 20144 Milan, Italy.
Rosaria IardinoThe Bridge Foundation, 20144 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-8474-644X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents approximately 15% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Its heterogeneity and absence of targetable receptors make treatment particularly challenging, and it is burdened by a worse prognosis than other breast cancer subtypes. The absence of standardized care pathways may impede the accessibility of information for patients and caregivers. The present survey was conducted as part of a co-participatory process aimed at informing the development of a patient journey for TNBC. A group of statements was developed based on relevant literature, current guidelines, and good practice points (GPPs) for effective TNBC care and subsequently evaluated by a multi-stakeholder panel. Key steps in the care journey were then selected for the survey, and Coordinators of Italian BUs (65.4%) indicated the level of perceived importance and reported implementation of each item. Descriptive statistical analyses were employed. Despite some gaps concerning issues such as the involvement of general practitioners (GPs), data show agreement on perceived importance and generally adequate levels of reported implementation of core aspects of TNBC care, providing support for the development of an optimal care journey for triple-negative breast cancer patients grounded in real-world practice, which may help generate useful guidance where clear pathways are still lacking.

Indexed as

Breast Unitsco-created processmulti-stakeholder methodoptimal care pathwayspatient journeyreal-world evidencetriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID41744847
PMCPMC12938997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.