ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer in Manitoba: A Retrospective Study of the Impact of Geography on Care.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesCervical cancer outcomes based on geographic location of residence reveal inconsistent patterns, and most of the evidence is from the United States. This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether there existed a difference in overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between individuals living within a Canadian city with a tertiary care centre versus those living remotely within a large catchment area (up to >1000 km travel distance), including a sizeable rural component.
methodsSurgically treated cervical cancer patients from 2000 to 2016 were included. Patients were treated with either radical hysterectomy, trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy. Adjuvant treatment was provided depending on surgical pathology. OS and RFS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and cumulative incidence curves.
resultsTwo hundred and eighty-two patients with surgically treated cervical cancer were included: 185 patients living within urban city limits and 97 patients living rurally. There were no significant baseline differences between groups. No significant difference in OS or RFS was found, even after adjusting for death as a competing risk for RFS. The median time to surgery for residents living within versus outside the city was 84 vs. 66 days, respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant (
conclusionsThis is the first Canadian study to examine an association between survival and distance to care for cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.