Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744741›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2026

Optical Biosensors for Blood Coagulation Monitoring: Advantages, Limitations, and Translational Potential.

Zichen Wang, Gaohong Di, Jing Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zichen WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Gaohong DiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-9134
Jing WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic monitoring of hemostatic equilibrium is indispensable for clinical safety in high-risk scenarios, while current clinical methods are limited by sample volume, detection speed, and physiological relevance. These shortcomings underscore the demand for novel sensing platforms. Optical biosensors, leveraging label-free detection, rapid response, and multi-level characterization, could serve as a transformative solution for decentralized and point-of-care monitoring. This review systematically summarizes advances in optical coagulation testing, encompassing light transmission aggregometry, laser speckle rheology, optical coherence tomography/elastography, optic-acoustic coupled methods, and fluorescence biosensing. These technologies complementarily capture structural and mechanical and some molecular and cellular dynamics of coagulation, bridging gaps in traditional assays. Despite promising preclinical and clinical correlations, translation barriers persist in lack of standardization of metrics, interference mitigation, and multi-center validation in diverse patient cohorts. Future development of optical biosensing platforms for coagulation testing should focus on modular integration, AI-aided interference correction, and microfluidic miniaturization to realize actionable, real-time coagulation assessment. Optical biosensors hold unparalleled potential to transform hemostatic monitoring from static endpoint testing to dynamic, interpretable evaluation, guiding personalized clinical decisions.

Indexed as

clinical applicationcoagulation monitoringhemostatic assessmentoptical biosensorspoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID41744741
PMCPMC12939117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.