ReviewBiosensors2026
Biosensor Technologies for Avian Influenza Detection: A New Frontier in Rapid Diagnostics for HPAI.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avian influenza (AI), particularly highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), represents a serious and growing threat to global poultry production, international trade, and human health security. Control of AI is complicated by the high evolutionary rate of influenza A viruses, which drives antigenic diversity and ongoing emergence of novel strains. Effective surveillance and disease management therefore depend on timely and accurate diagnostics. While conventional methods-including virus isolation, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs)-remain effective and widely used, they are limited by long turnaround times, the need for specialized equipment, and reliance on highly trained personnel. In addition, strict state and federal regulatory requirements restrict testing to a limited number of authorized laboratories. Although these regulations are essential for maintaining diagnostic accuracy and quality assurance, they place substantial strain on laboratory capacity during outbreaks and delay actionable results. The need for rapid, on-site decision making has driven interest in alternative diagnostic approaches, including biosensor technologies. A major limitation of current diagnostic strategies is the lack of robust DIVA (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) capability. In countries such as the United States, where poultry vaccination against AI is not routinely practiced, the absence of DIVA-compatible diagnostics has hindered adoption of vaccination as a disease management tool, as seropositive birds and products face significant trade restrictions. Biosensor platforms capable of enabling DIVA strategies offer a potential pathway to support vaccination while preserving surveillance integrity. This review examines the current landscape of AI and HPAI diagnostics, emphasizing the limitations of traditional approaches and the opportunities presented by biosensor platforms. We evaluate electrochemical, optical, piezoelectric, and nucleic-acid-based biosensors, with particular attention to biorecognition strategies, performance metrics, field deployability, and applications supporting subtype discrimination, DIVA implementation, and One Health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.