Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744551›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

An Improved Mantis Search Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems.

Yanjiao Wang, Tongchao Dou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanjiao WangSchool of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 169 Changchun Road, Jilin 132012, China.
Tongchao DouSchool of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 169 Changchun Road, Jilin 132012, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional mantis search algorithm (MSA) suffers from limitations such as slow convergence and a high likelihood of converging to local optima in complex optimization scenarios. This paper proposes an improved mantis search algorithm (IMSA) to overcome these issues. An adaptive probability conversion factor is designed, which adaptively controls the proportion of individuals entering the search phase and the attack phase so that the algorithm can smoothly transition from large-scale global exploration to local fine search. In the search phase, a probability update strategy based on both subspace and full space is designed, significantly improving the adaptability of the algorithm to complex problems by dynamically adjusting the search range. The elite population screening mechanism, based on Euclidean distance and fitness double criteria, is introduced to provide dual guidance for the evolution direction of the algorithm. In the attack stage, the base vector adaptive probability selection mechanism is designed, and the algorithm's pertinence in different optimization stages is enhanced by dynamically adjusting the base vector selection strategy. Finally, in the stage of sexual cannibalism, the directed random disturbance update method of inferior individuals is adopted, and the population is directly introduced through the non-greedy replacement strategy, which effectively overcomes the loss of population diversity. The experimental results of 29 test functions on the CEC2017 test set demonstrate that the IMSA exhibits significant advantages in convergence speed, calculation accuracy, and stability compared to the original MSA and the five best meta-heuristic algorithms.

Indexed as

adaptive dynamic regulationdouble-criterion elite orientationmantis search algorithmmeta-heuristic algorithmssubspace-full space collaborative search

Identifiers

PMID41744551
PMCPMC12938541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.