ReviewClinics and practice2026
Fracture of Rotary Instruments in Third Molar Extraction: Evidence from a Scoping Review.
Review in Clinics and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRotary instrument fracture during third molar extraction is rare but clinically relevant, presenting diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.
aimThis scoping review summarizes available evidence on bur breakage and displacement during third molar surgery, focusing on causes, clinical manifestations, and management strategies. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published from January 2008 to March 2025 reporting rotary instrument fracture during third molar extraction. Extracted data were qualitatively analyzed.
resultsEight studies reporting eleven clinical cases were included. All fractures occurred during mandibular third molar extractions. Pain was the most frequent symptom (45%), followed by swelling (27%) and trismus (18%). Management varied from immediate surgical retrieval to conservative observation.
conclusionsAlthough uncommon, rotary bur fracture during third molar extraction requires preventive attention and accurate reporting. Adherence to manufacturer recommendations, single-use bur policies, and adequate irrigation should be considered. Prospective multicenter and mechanical studies are needed to establish standardized management protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.