ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Improving knowledge of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) through bioinformatics and article annotation.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fantastic microbes and where to find them: evaluating learning-by-doing outcomes in a crowdfunded metagenomics workshop.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA from microbial communities can be sequenced and assembled to gain insight into the microbes that may be present in unique environments. Powerful computational tools, combined with more accessible sequencing technologies, have enabled metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) analysis in course-based settings. However, the computational methods and assumptions surrounding the creation of MAGs, as well as their application in understanding microbes in biomes, are often complex and intimidating to new users. The metagenomics course we designed enrolls undergraduate and graduate students in a half-semester lab experience. We hypothesized that collaborative annotation of specific bioinformatics research articles, paired with student application of tools using guided case studies on the powerful KBase bioinformatics web platform, would enhance learning of key MAG concepts. Student learning outcomes on conceptual quizzes, as well as learner perceptions of the assignment and confidence in using KBase and other bioinformatics tools, were analyzed. Assessments and surveys of student perceptions were collected over several semesters using consistent assignments, readings, and KBase narratives. Learning gains were identified for specific MAG analysis concepts and data interpretation. Nevertheless, misconceptions continue, and confidence in bioinformatics approaches varies. Additional exploration of qualitative data may suggest concepts to reinforce and resources to support learners. Combining KBase, collaborative annotation of primary literature, guided case studies, and aligned assessments effectively promotes students' conceptual and mechanistic understanding of MAGs and the assumptions underlying their creation and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.