ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Model-Informed Dosing Regimen of Sugemalimab for European Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Bridging From Asian Clinical Data.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Model-informed drug development (MIDD) framework was employed to bridge sugemalimab dosing from an Asian population to European patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We evaluated whether a fixed dose of 1200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) provides adequate exposure for European patients and, if not, which weight threshold and alternative dose would restore pivotal-trial exposures and projected benefit. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model, developed from 1002 subjects (97.6% Asian) across six clinical trials, was externally validated using data from an extended-interval higher-dose regimen. Based on the validated popPK model, exposure simulations for high-weight European patients (80-150 kg) under various dosing scenarios were then compared to exposures in the pivotal Asian study. Results indicated that while the 1200 mg Q3W dose provided adequate exposure for patients weighing up to 115 kg, those weighing 115-150 kg had lower exposures. To match the exposure-efficacy profile of the pivotal study, a 1500 mg Q3W dose was proposed for this higher-weight subgroup. Simulations from exposure-response (ER) models confirmed that the 1500 mg Q3W dose for high-weight patients would achieve comparable survival probabilities to the 1200 mg Q3W dose in Asian patients. The proposed regimen of 1500 mg Q3W for patients weighing over 115 kg ensures consistent therapeutic exposure, efficacy, and safety across diverse populations. The MIDD strategy for bridging dose regimens, substantiated by this study, enabled regulatory approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) without the need for additional dedicated clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.