ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Bayesian Machine Learning Model Guiding Iterative, Personalized Anticoagulant Dosing Decision-Making: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial Analysis.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnticoagulation in atrial fibrillation often relies on a fixed dose and infrequent dose adjustment and does not incorporate patient preferences for risks of stroke, bleeding, and death.
objectivesWe developed a Bayesian machine learning model (Adele) to guide individualized long-term dosing accounting for patient preferences.
methodsAdele is a Bayesian competing-risk, multistate hazard model trained on 5,380 edoxaban-treated patients with atrial fibrillation with pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-TIMI 48) trial. Patient PK and baseline data were used to estimate personalized continual risk prediction. The concordance index compared predictive accuracy of Adele with standard Kaplan-Meier estimators. Positive concordance index values (%) indicate better predictive accuracy for Adele. In 2 patient examples, we demonstrate Adele's ability to predict 3-year event frequencies at randomization and following intercurrent events identifying optimal dosing across three edoxaban doses (60mg, 30mg, 15mg) based on hypothetical outcome preferences.
resultsAdele outperformed Kaplan-Meier estimators, improving 3-year prediction for cardiovascular death by +12.1%, disability by +11.8%, major gastrointestinal bleeding by +13.7%, and ischemic stroke (IS) by +3.3%. Adele demonstrated dynamic risk prediction capabilities, with future event probabilities shifting following intracranial hemorrhage or IS. In patient A (80-yr female; 52 kg), preference-weighted event rates were lowest at 15 mg and 30 mg, irrespective of the preference to avoid cardiovascular death, major bleeding, or disability. In patient B (72-yr male; 80 kg), preference-weighted event rates were lowest at 60 mg, irrespective of the preference to avoid death or IS/intracranial hemorrhage, and instead lowest at 15 mg for disability avoidance.
conclusionsAdele represents a state-of-the-art Bayesian framework, using clinical factors and PK data, to enable longitudinally adaptive, patient-centric, preference-weighted predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.