Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744446›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2026

Calorie Restriction Effects on Aging, Learning Performance, and Transcription in Aged Aplysia californica.

Eric C Randolph, Lynne A Fieber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric C RandolphDepartment of Marine Biology and Ecology, University of Miami Rosenstiel School, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6663-9458
Lynne A FieberDepartment of Marine Biology and Ecology, University of Miami Rosenstiel School, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7717-2260

Funding

The National Resource for Aplysia-Curation & Informatics.P40OD010952 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ROSENTEIL SCHOOL · PI M Danielle McDonald · 2012 to 2026
$10.7M
National Science Foundation 2213824NIH HHS P40OD010952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Along with increasing an animal's lifespan, calorie restriction (CR) is shown to improve an animal's cognition. To elucidate the molecular differences that accompany CR that may benefit cognition, sibling Aplysia californica were reared on either an ad-lib (AL) or CR diet. Siblings from each diet were trained in two behaviors, learning food is inedible (LFI) and habituation of the tail withdrawal reflex (TWR), at two time points along their lifespans: younger animals at training time 1 (TT1) and aged siblings at training time 2 (TT2). In analysis by diet, TT2 CR animals' learning performance was on par with their TT1 CR siblings in both paradigms, illustrating a maintenance of cognition in age. Meanwhile, TT2 AL animals performed worse than TT1 AL siblings in habituation but better in LFI, illustrating the lack of cognitive maintenance in age. RNA sequencing was performed on part of the buccal ganglia that houses many of the neurons involved in LFI. Gene expression results implied morphological changes occurring within the motor and interneurons of the buccal ganglia after learning in LFI. These neurons showed enrichment of protein kinase C binding (GO:0005080), cadherin binding (GO:0045296), and microtubule severing ATPase activity (GO:0008568) as well as neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction (ko04080) and valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis (ko00290) all of which have been implicated to assist in memory consolidation and reconsolidation.

Indexed as

agingAplysia californicacalorie restrictionlearning food is inedibleRNA‐sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41744446
PMCPMC12937505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.