Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744373›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Parks and Recreation in Cancer Prevention: Bringing Cancer Center Outreach and Engagement Initiatives to Public Spaces Through Partnership With Local Governments.

Katherine Oestman, Margaret Raber, Karen Basen-Engquist, Brad Love, Trina Rodriguez, Clifford Hatch, Louis Moore, Howard Frumkin, Ruth Rechis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katherine OestmanCancer Prevention and Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Margaret RaberDepartment of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2403-9607
Karen Basen-EngquistDepartment of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Brad LoveCenter for Health Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-5219
Trina RodriguezDepartment of Parks and Recreation, City of Pasadena, Pasadena, TX, USA.
Clifford HatchDepartment of Parks and Recreation, City of Baytown, Baytown, TX, USA.
Louis MooreDepartment of Parks and Recreation, City of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Howard FrumkinDepartment of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ruth RechisCancer Prevention and Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionPublic parks are an integral part of the built environment, with a considerable role to promote public health by advancing physical health, mental wellness and overall quality of life. The potential exists for parks and greenspace to contribute to cancer control and prevention, and local park and recreation departments (PARDs) are natural partners for Comprehensive Cancer Centers as they pursue Community Outreach and Engagement activities. However there is a lack of research on best practices for structuring these relationships to ensure success.MethodsA collaboration framework for Comprehensive Cancer Centers and PARDs was informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model of implementation science. The model was applied by a large cancer center to 3 implementation sites in the greater Houston area. A set of shared measures were developed and tracked across all sites.ResultsThree PARDs implemented 5 unique active living and sun safety evidence-based interventions (EBIs) of 2 main types, educational focused interventions (to increase knowledge and change behavior) and infrastructure interventions (to modify the physical environment). Three-quarters (75%, 9/12) of all educational EBIs across communities were sustained by the PARDs one or more years after the funding ended; all (13/13) infrastructure projects were completed during the active implementation period and sustained by the PARDs. A range of 10-39 partners supported the work of the PARDs.ConclusionThe 3 collaboration sites each offer a case study on the impact and effectiveness of health promotion across sectors to impact modifiable risk factors for cancer, leveraging the replicable EPIS model. Partnership is critical to both sectors to advance community health and impact.

Indexed as

cancer preventioncoalitionscommunity engagementmultisector partnershipparks

Identifiers

PMID41744373
PMCPMC12949261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.