Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744298›Full record

ArticleMedical care2026

Improving Diagnosis: Evaluation of Diagnostic Experiences Classified as Problems, Mistakes, or Both by Patients and Care Partners From a Nationally Representative Survey.

Kelly T Gleason, Kathryn M McDonald, Rachel Grob, Christina T Yuan, Isha Dhingra, Emily Warne, Mark Schlesinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly T GleasonSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-4203-6517
Kathryn M McDonaldSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Rachel GrobDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Christina T YuanHealth Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Isha DhingraHealth Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Emily WarneDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Mark SchlesingerHealth Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS029789AHRQ HHS R18 HS029350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding patients' experiences with diagnosis is crucial for improving care. Clarifying how best to ask about these experiences is an essential step in doing so.

objectiveTo elicit and then categorize diagnostic problems and mistakes in a national, population-based survey.

methodsDrawing from a nationally representative panel, respondents were asked whether they had experienced (directly or as a care partner) a diagnostic problem or mistake in the last 4 years. They then classified the experience as a mistake, a problem only, or a combination of both. Respondents who experienced multiple problems and mistakes reported on their most memorable experience. We compared responses among those reporting a problem, a mistake, or a combination of both.

resultsA third [1216/3684 (33.0%)] of screened households reported diagnostic problems or mistakes involving themselves [697/3684 (18.9%)] or someone close to them [519/3684 (14.1%)]. A plurality [448/3684 (12.2%)] categorized these as a mistake, 382 (10.4%) as a problem, and 371 (10.1%) as both. Experiences reported as problems versus mistakes were equally likely to be associated with harmful consequences and concrete clinician responses. The distribution of problems and mistakes across the 3 categories did not significantly differ when reported by patients versus care partners, though there were checkered differences in the reported impact.

conclusionsWhether labeled as problems or mistakes, diagnostic experiences reported by patients and care partners are accompanied by substantial emotional, physical, and financial impacts. Responding to this full range of patient experiences is important for guiding improvements in diagnostic quality within learning health systems.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultcaregiversDiagnostic errorshealth care qualitynational surveypatient-reported outcomessurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41744298
PMCPMC13014693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.