ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026
Quantitative 3D Real-Space Analysis of Photonic Supraparticles.
Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Supraparticles (SPs) are assemblies of smaller particles, and they form an interesting material class. One way through which these structures can be formed is self-assembly (SA) in spherical confinement, and what makes them unique is that they combine the properties of the smaller particles with collective properties arising from the length scale on which these smaller particles are ordered. Additionally, the limited number of particles in an SP enables them to form structures that are not found in bulk systems. An example of this is icosahedral symmetry, which is the equilibrium structure for SPs up to several hundreds of thousands of particles. Although these icosahedral structures have been investigated through computer simulations and several experimental techniques have been used to analyze them in 3D, the number of experimental datasets published is so limited that no statistically relevant conclusions have been drawn so far. The experimental technique most commonly applied to study them is scanning electron microscopy (SEM), but with this, only quantitative information about the surface of the SPs can be obtained. By using a combination of 3D confocal and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy on extremely well-index-matched (within 0.002) fluorescent core-shell, colloidal silica spheres (of 442-478 nm in diameter with polydispersities below 1%), we obtained full 3D real-space datasets of tens of SPs within several hours. The structures were classified based on bond order parameters and deviations from local centrosymmetry, using an unsupervised machine learning model. From this, we are able to correctly classify structures that are commonly misidentified using SEM. Additionally, the quantitative real-space analysis gave experimental insights into the SA pathway and defect formation mechanisms of mostly icosahedral SPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.