ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Phylogenomics to structure: evolutionary and clinical signals in the TP53 DNA-binding core through LOOCV-validated ensemble learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovering New Orthologous Groups with P-COGs.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
TP53 encodes a master tumor suppressor, and understanding its evolutionary constraints is critical for interpreting pathogenic variation. We developed a fully reproducible computational pipeline integrating evolutionary genomics, structural biology, and clinical variant analysis to systematically prioritize functionally critical residues in TP53. We used fixed effects likelihood and fast unconstrained Bayesian approximation to perform genome-wide alignment, maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation, and site-specific selection testing over 19 vertebrate orthologs. We mapped these evolutionary signals onto the AlphaFold-predicted structure and integrated 3936 human variants from ClinVar and UniProt. Selection analysis identified five sites under positive or diversifying selection, with a single consensus position detected by both methods: multiple-sequence-alignment position 606 (human codon 129) in the DNA-binding domain. Structural mapping revealed that pathogenic variants concentrate at the DNA-contacting interface, with residues 239-248 emerging as the highest-priority targets based on our composite scoring system that integrates evolutionary constraint, pathogenic burden, hotspot density, and domain importance. Machine learning validation under leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) demonstrated robust predictive performance. A Ridge-ExtraTrees ensemble achieved $\textrm{MAE (mean absolute error)}=2.84$, $\textrm{RMSE(root mean squared error)}=3.72$, $R^{2}=0.91$ for phylogenetic-distance regression and 89.5% accuracy (17/19) for clade classification. A multi-branch deep neural network attained comparable results ($\textrm{MAE}=2.33$, $\textrm{RMSE}=2.56$, $R^{2}=0.86$), while Random Forest substantially underperformed ($\textrm{MAE}\approx 7.19$, $\textrm{RMSE}\approx 8.82$, $R^{2}\approx 0.47$, accuracy $\approx 63\%$) due to shrinkage and class-imbalance bias. Our findings show that evolutionary signals and clinical variants converge within the structurally constrained DNA-binding core of TP53, with codon 129 representing a robust positive-selection site and residues 239-248 constituting the primary pathogenic hotspot. This AlphaFold-anchored, LOOCV-validated framework offers a systematic, generalizable approach for residue-level prioritization to guide mechanistic studies and potentially inform precision oncology applications pending experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.