Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744224›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.

Cong Qi, Wenbo Wang, Siqi Jiang, Qin Liu, Xun Song, Hanzhang Fang, Zhi Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cong QiDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Wenbo WangDepartment of Computer Science, Hamilton College, 198 College Hill Road, Clinton, NY 13323, United States.
Siqi JiangDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Qin LiuMartin Tuchman School of Management, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Xun SongDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Hanzhang FangDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, United States.
Zhi WeiDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, United States.

Funding

Novel Computational and Statistical Methods for Single-cell Omics DataR35GM158529 · NIGMS · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Zhi Wei · 2025 to 2026
$753k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM158529NIH HHS 1R35GM158529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of biological data and experimental complexity has motivated increasing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) systems that extend beyond static prediction toward autonomous reasoning and action. While recent computational models achieve strong predictive performance, they largely operate as passive tools within human-driven research workflows. In contrast, AI agents integrate reasoning, planning, tool invocation, and feedback-driven refinement, enabling more adaptive and interactive forms of biological analysis. This survey provides a systematic synthesis of recent progress in biological AI agents by reviewing over 100 representative studies across clinical analytics, molecular and drug design, multi-omics analysis, and knowledge discovery. We introduce a unified 5D taxonomy that organizes existing work along task domains, system architectures, interaction modes, evaluation strategies, and resource integration. Building on this framework, we analyze common design patterns, highlight emerging capabilities enabled by agentic paradigms, and identify key open challenges, including reliability, privacy, scalability, and standardized evaluation. Collectively, this survey clarifies the conceptual and methodological landscape of biological AI agents and outlines directions toward more robust, transparent, and collaborative agent-based systems for biological research. To serve as a living resource for the community, we curated a GitHub repository that includes resources and benchmark summaries, available at https://github.com/MineSelf2016/biological_agents_survey.

Indexed as

bioinformaticscomputational biologygenerative AI

Identifiers

PMID41744224
PMCPMC12936789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.