ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Multi-actor collaborations in primary health care implementation: a Social Network Analysis of the primary health care strategy in Ghana.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bottom-up theory demonstrates that networks of actors play important roles in policy implementation, yet limited attention has so far been paid to the influence that actor networks might have on the implementation of primary health care (PHC) strategies and outcomes. This study examined the roles actor networks play in the implementation of Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) in Ghana, focusing on the nature and patterns of relations and structure and strength of prevailing collaborations. This was a cross-sectional study using a social network analysis methodology in eight districts across two regions in Ghana. The study population was implementers of CHPS from the community, district, regional, national, and development partners. Data were obtained using a modified pretested closed-ended social network questionnaire. To establish collaborative relationships, knowledge of other actors and the degree of communication on issues related to CHPS implementation were surveyed. Data were analysed using Gephi software version 0.9.2. The analysis demonstrated existing actor networks of Community Health Committees (CHCs), Community Health Officers (CHOs), Community Health Volunteers (CHVs), Sub-district, and district-level networks, including local government actors and political leaders, as well as regional, national, and development partner actors in CHPS implementation. The nature of relations showed isolated networks of CHCs, CHVs, and sub-districts across both regions. Patterns of interactions revealed that CHO networks collaborate with each other, while CHCs primarily collaborate with CHOs. Overall, weak collaborative relationships were noted among the actor networks (network density <10%). The results suggest segmented, decentralized networks with limited involvement of critical actors, including community-level, local government, political leaders, national-level, and development partners in CHPS implementation. The network analysis highlights weak collaborative relationships among actor networks in CHPS implementation, a practice which negatively impacts its implementation experience. The study highlights pathway to strengthen cohesion and improve collaborative relationships in addressing CHPS as a PHC strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.