ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Geographic access to radiotherapy facilities in Japan.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiotherapy utilization in the last 30 days before death among patients with malignant neoplasms in Japan: a claims database study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Prioritizing radiotherapy infrastructure in depopulating societies: a 2050 blueprint from Akita, Japan.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Daily attendance requirements for radiotherapy (RT) make geographic accessibility a critical determinant of treatment adherence and completion. Although facility surveys indicate that advanced modalities such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and brachytherapy are concentrated in urban centers, precise nationwide quantification of the resulting patient travel burden remains lacking. This study provides the first nationwide, modality-stratified assessment of geographic access to RT in Japan. Using the Open Source Routing Machine and a high-resolution dataset of 176 964 household-weighted 1-km mesh centroids, we calculated driving times to the nearest external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), IMRT and brachytherapy facilities. Beyond standard distribution metrics, we generated high-resolution 'penalty maps' to quantify the incremental time tax imposed by advanced modality requirements. Although EBRT access was uniformly short nationwide, with a median travel time of 6.48 min, this increased to 8.26 min for IMRT and 14.06 min for brachytherapy. Crucially, the proportion of the population facing poor access (≥120 min) doubled from 0.24% for EBRT to 0.48% for brachytherapy. The spatial analysis identified specific 'newly poor-access' areas-regions that are accessible for EBRT but become remote when advanced care is needed-forming coherent geographic clusters in mountainous and island zones. These findings demonstrate that modality requirements introduce meaningful inequities despite strong national EBRT infrastructure. These indicators provide a vital evidence base for spatially optimizing resources to mitigate travel burdens for Japan's aging, mobility-limited population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.