Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744120›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2026

Multimodality Approach to Coronary Ischemic Testing in Pediatric Patients: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Laura J Olivieri, Simon Lee, Ming Hui Chen, Nagib Dahdah, Tam T Doan, Anusha Jegatheeswaran, Rajesh Krishnamurthy, Elif Seda Selamet Tierney, Elizabeth M Weber, Anupama Rao and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura J Olivieri
Simon Lee
Ming Hui Chen
Nagib Dahdah
Tam T Doan
Anusha Jegatheeswaran
Rajesh Krishnamurthy
Elif Seda Selamet Tierney
Elizabeth M Weber
Anupama Rao
American Heart Association Council on Lifelong Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Health in the Young, and the Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As new research reveals the value of provocative and ischemic coronary testing in various acquired and congenital coronary issues in children, an unmet need for targeted and thoughtful provocative ischemic testing emerges as a high priority for our field. A number of evidence-based guidelines and scientific statements for conditions including Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children associated with coronary aneurysms, anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and surgically repaired congenital heart disease involving coronary artery manipulation now recommend provocative ischemic testing in children. The strengths and limitations of various testing modalities and provocative agents are explored, including the evidence for use in children. In addition, evidence-based adaptations and recommendations for optimizing use of these technologies in children are noted. The pediatric cardiac imaging community requires more information to understand appropriate use of existing provocative ischemic modalities and to help develop the technology for future use.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMultimodal ImagingMyocardial IschemiaAmerican Heart AssociationChildHumansMucocutaneous Lymph Node SyndromePredictive Value of TestsUnited StatesAHA scientific statementsanomalous coronary arterycardiac imaging techniquescongenital heart defectscoronary artery diseasemucocutaneous lymph node syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41744120
PMCPMC13279187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.