Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744018›Full record

ReviewIntractable & rare diseases research2026

The imperative for national legislation on rare diseases in China: A policy review and call to action.

Yangyang Li, Zheng Liu, Rufang Huang, Yugang Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yangyang LiChinese Organization for Rare Disorders (CORD), Beijing, China.
Zheng LiuSimon-Kucher & Partners, Global Strategy and Marketing Consulting, Shanghai, China.
Rufang HuangChinese Organization for Rare Disorders (CORD), Beijing, China.
Yugang LiuSimon-Kucher & Partners, Global Strategy and Marketing Consulting, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare diseases represent a significant public health challenge in China, affecting an estimated 20 million individuals. Despite incremental policy improvements over the past decade, including the publication of two National Rare Disease Lists, an increasing number of available treatments, and the inclusion of some therapies in the Nationally Reimbursed Drug List (NRDL), patients continue to face systemic challenges in diagnosis, treatment access, and sustainable protection. That said, China has very limited rare disease research & development (R&D) and industrial development, so the market potential is far from being tapped. This policy review argues that the lack of a national legal definition for rare diseases and orphan drugs, an unsustainable payment mechanism for high-value innovative therapies, and insufficient incentives for domestic research and development have collectively hindered the creation of a sustainable rare disease ecosystem. Drawing on an analysis of patient registry data, policy documents, and proposals from China's National People's Congress (NPC) sessions, we demonstrate a growing societal consensus on the need for comprehensive national legislation on rare diseases, which is not only a moral imperative to safeguard the rights of patients but also a strategic necessity for a national population strategy and biomedical industrial development. We consider systemic rare disease legislation in China to be imperative, and now is the optimal time to promote rare disease legislation in China. We propose nine key initiatives, including establishment of a working committee on national legislation, creating a standardized definition of rare diseases and orphan drugs, creating a dedicated national rare disease fund, and robust R&D incentives.

Indexed as

biomedical industryChinahealth policylegislationorphan drugrare diseases

Identifiers

PMID41744018
PMCPMC12932008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.