ReviewIntractable & rare diseases research2026
The imperative for national legislation on rare diseases in China: A policy review and call to action.
Review in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Policy lessons regarding medical security for rare diseases inChina: Insights from Zhejiang Province through the multiplestreams framework.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- The "China model" for rare disease governance: Policy framework, local implementation, and pathways for optimization.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- From presence to provenance: Building substantive infrastructure for China's rare disease ecosystem.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- Bridging the medical cliff: a paediatric-adult continuity of care model for 2,341 young adults with rare diseases in China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases represent a significant public health challenge in China, affecting an estimated 20 million individuals. Despite incremental policy improvements over the past decade, including the publication of two National Rare Disease Lists, an increasing number of available treatments, and the inclusion of some therapies in the Nationally Reimbursed Drug List (NRDL), patients continue to face systemic challenges in diagnosis, treatment access, and sustainable protection. That said, China has very limited rare disease research & development (R&D) and industrial development, so the market potential is far from being tapped. This policy review argues that the lack of a national legal definition for rare diseases and orphan drugs, an unsustainable payment mechanism for high-value innovative therapies, and insufficient incentives for domestic research and development have collectively hindered the creation of a sustainable rare disease ecosystem. Drawing on an analysis of patient registry data, policy documents, and proposals from China's National People's Congress (NPC) sessions, we demonstrate a growing societal consensus on the need for comprehensive national legislation on rare diseases, which is not only a moral imperative to safeguard the rights of patients but also a strategic necessity for a national population strategy and biomedical industrial development. We consider systemic rare disease legislation in China to be imperative, and now is the optimal time to promote rare disease legislation in China. We propose nine key initiatives, including establishment of a working committee on national legislation, creating a standardized definition of rare diseases and orphan drugs, creating a dedicated national rare disease fund, and robust R&D incentives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.